Timesheet Form Template
A weekly hours report a human will finish without groaning, covering days worked, totals, variances, and a certifying signature in under two minutes.
Log your week by Friday close. Two minutes, one signature, and payroll runs on time for everyone.
Only hours your supervisor pre-approved.
You are confirming this record is accurate and complete.
The perfect timesheet is a contradiction: detailed enough for payroll and audits, simple enough that tired people fill it in correctly on Friday afternoon. Tip too far toward detail and you get fiction, beautifully itemized hours invented at week's end. This template takes a firm position: capture the week at the resolution payroll pays at, and let a signature carry the accountability that fifteen extra fields only pretend to.
Why the resolution is coarse. The week-starting date normalizes every submission to the same Monday anchor, which is what makes the responses table stack into a clean payroll period instead of a puzzle. The days-worked checklist plus two totals is the whole simplification: most payroll systems consume these exact numbers, and per-day hour grids add transcription errors on their way to being summed anyway. Regular and overtime hours sit in separate fields because they are paid at different rates, and the overtime field's description restates the pre-approval policy at the moment of entry. The variance notes give the anomalies a home, the half-day or the site visit, which is the context that turns a supervisor's question into a ten-second answer. The certifying signature is the legal spine, and a drawn signature on a stated week turns a data entry into an attested record.
What it skips on purpose. Per-day hour grids, project time allocation, and break tracking all stay off it. Teams that bill time by project need time-tracking software rather than a weekly form, and jurisdictions with strict break-logging rules need punch systems. This is the payroll timesheet for everyone else, which is most teams.
Who runs payroll on it. Small businesses paying hourly staff without a punch-clock system, agencies collecting contractor weeks for invoicing, field crews submitting from a phone at the truck, and accountants who want signed hour records instead of text messages.
Run it clean each week. If your week starts Sunday, change one label. Add a job-site dropdown if crews split across locations. Set duplicate prevention to device mode to discourage double submissions of the same week, and enable email notifications so the supervisor can eyeball each sheet as it lands. At pay-run time, the CSV export is the whole point: one row per person per week, hours in columns, ready for payroll import, with the signature still attached to each response for the day an auditor asks. The submitted sheets are rarely the problem, though; the absent ones are. Keep a simple roster beside the responses table and reconcile every Monday morning, checking names present, week-start dates aligned, and gaps flagged before payroll cutoff instead of after. A submitted week with an odd number gets fixed in one question, while a missing week discovered at pay run becomes an advance, a correction, and an apology. Most teams find the same three people are late every cycle, so solve those three with a standing reminder and the whole process goes quiet.
Frequently asked questions
How do employees fix a mistake after submitting?
They resubmit the same week with a note in the variances field. Responses are timestamped, so the latest sheet for a given week is authoritative.
Can this handle two-week pay periods?
Keep weekly submissions and sum pairs of weeks in the CSV export. Weekly capture stays accurate, and pay-period math belongs in payroll anyway.
Why only totals instead of hours per day?
Payroll pays on totals, and day-grids tend to manufacture transcription errors. The days-worked checklist preserves the attendance picture without the grid.
Is the signature meaningful on a timesheet?
A certification signature attached to stated hours is the contemporaneous record wage-and-hour reviews look for.